BCS has filed two actions with the court today, both related to the 2012-13 facilities offer.
#1) BCS filed an anti-SLAPP suit. These actions are generally intended to allow someone to halt frivolous litigation that doesn't have merits on it's own. However, in this case, the process is being misapplied as a way for BCS to attempt to eliminate the District's cross-complaint in the facilities issue. I won't go into the legal reasoning, but we are very confident that the Distr'ct amended cross-complaint will be permitted to stand, and that the anti-SLAPP suit will be defeated. However, it does serve to drag out the process.
#2) BCS filed actions trying to eliminate the District's cross-complaint on other grounds. if you're a legal eagle, you can probably make good sense out of this. I read it as yet another attemtp to ignore what's really going on. I haven't had a lot of time with it yet, but wanted to get it all out there so people can review it.
Attached are all of the relevant documents.
Amended Cross-Complaint
LASD Amended Cross Complaint
Anti-SLAPP Motion
BCS Special Notice (Anti-SLAPP Motion)
Memo of Points and Authorities (case arguement)
Eyring Decl. (anti-SLAPP)
Proof of Service
Actions of 2012-13 Ruling
BCS Notice Demurrer
Memo, of Points and Authorities (Demurrer)
Request for Judicial Notice
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Proposed Order
